Yep, Bo really cares about women.
Unless they are over 70. Then their doctors may not be allowed to treat them in an emergency room (already being enacted).
Or they are women who think it's more important for their family to have food than health insurance.
Or they are women doctor or pharmacist who believe it is a sin to preform an abortion or hand out birth control.
Or, of course, if she is a woman who is not born yet. Than she doesn't even have the most basic right to life.
You know, actually, it looks like BO only really cares about women who want to kill their babies. Hmmm.
What socialized medicine actually is is telling one woman she has to pay for another woman's doctor and medicine.
I have a novel Idea: let's each ay for our own medical expenses.
Unless they are over 70. Then their doctors may not be allowed to treat them in an emergency room (already being enacted).
Or they are women who think it's more important for their family to have food than health insurance.
Or they are women doctor or pharmacist who believe it is a sin to preform an abortion or hand out birth control.
Or, of course, if she is a woman who is not born yet. Than she doesn't even have the most basic right to life.
You know, actually, it looks like BO only really cares about women who want to kill their babies. Hmmm.
What socialized medicine actually is is telling one woman she has to pay for another woman's doctor and medicine.
I have a novel Idea: let's each ay for our own medical expenses.
Can you please elaborate on your statement "Unless they are over 70. Then their doctors may not be allowed to treat them in an emergency room (already being enacted)."?
ReplyDeleteThank you.
I will admit this is third hand information. Someone else was telling me a doctor they know complained that more than a year ago the ACA was already limiting the treatments they were allowed to offer those over 70. I have no way to verify it, so take it as circumstantial.
ReplyDeleteHowever, other countries with government controlled health care do have rules about what age what treatments are allowed (I understand that in England heart stints are only given to those under 50, meaning, no one since very few people under 50 need heart stints. My own father would have died if he had lived in England when he had his heart attack at age 70. He is still going strong today, five years later.)
The only way governments have to control costs is to limit what care is available to who, unlike the free market that can allow for much more innovations.
I hope you can take this in the spirit it is spoken. You are giving third hand hearsay as fact in your post. Please reread the Bible, you are sinning horribly.
ReplyDeleteAgain, can you provide any facts for your second paragraphs? I have family in England, and my 83 year old uncle received a heart stint last year. He is dirt poor, and relies fully on the health care there, and received the procedure. Here is a link that dispels the myth that people under 50 receive all the care in England under their health system. I do ask you to think about the statement that you made, if only under 50s were getting heart stints, how do you think there are so many older individuals in England? Does heart disease not exist there? http://www.factcheck.org/2010/02/koops-false-claims/
Facts are important to any discussion, especially when you are proudly proclaiming yourself a Christian who is bringing light in to the world. When you proclaim false witness you are not bringing light to Christ. I agree that there are problems with the ACA, but point out their REAL problems, not ones that are false. Be a light unto Christ.
Thank you for your comment. You are right that I need to check my facts better.
ReplyDeleteHave a blessed day.