Friday, August 22, 2014

CDC refuses to turn over documents to Congress: Evidence linking MMR vaccines to autism intentionally withheld from investigators

CDC refuses to turn over documents to Congress: Evidence linking MMR vaccines to autism intentionally withheld from investigators -

because we all know its better to have a lifelong mental debilitation than two weeks of measles.


  1. I am not sure if my original comment sent or not... it appears your comments are having issues. If it did not come to you for approval I'll try to recreate it below. If it did, please feel free to disregard this comment. :)

    The article you linked to does not give any unbiased scientific proof to back up it's claims. It does not cite any meta data research nor does it give any links specifically to this magical exam that the CDC is hiding. The MMR has been proven over and over, by multiple countries not just the USA, that it is safe and does not cause Autism. The only link between vaccines and autism has been disproven by everyone. The scientist who led the charge has even come out to say that he lied in his information, which is why no one can replicate his experiment. The supposed "cause" of the autism was the thermisol (mercury) in the combination shot, which was removed in the early 2000s.
    Also, the natural news article you linked states that AA babies are being born with rickets due to a lack of Vitamin D... please realize how phoney and false that statement is and run away from any site that tells you that. Skin tone, melanin production, is determined by genetics, DNA. God would not give a child a higher set of melanin and then have him born lacking something. That is one of the silliest statements I've ever read in a "news" story. It is blatantly false and shows the lack of credibility of that site.

  2. Than you for your comment:-)
    I did not receive your previous comment, so I will be checking things out to see what's going on there. Thank you for notifying me.

    Ok, the article was about a whistle-blower who just came forward. As much as we like instant information, these things take time, especially since the CDC for some reason doesn't want anyone to see the studies. It is being taken to court and processed. Hopefully truth will prevail and we will get to see those studies. All we do have is the testimony of a person who was involved in the research, which is kind of the point; all we really have to verify the safety of vaccines is the testimony of a bunch of people (from several countries) who make their living from fees paid by the drug companies who make their money from people getting the shots. The fox is guarding the chicken coop. This particular fox has a guilty conscious.

    The US is the only country that requires so many vaccines and so early. Part of what this man is saying is that a delay in getting shots lessons the incidents of Autism. He is saying he has seen (been part of doing!) the research and there IS a link. All the studies saying otherwise have been lies.

    Here's a question: What is causing Autism?

    Honestly, I'm not entirely (and never have been) convinced it is the shots (sonograms during pregnancy have gone up dramatically too). But SOMETHING is causing this epidemic. In 1940 1 out of every 40,000 children had autism (which means that the shots couldn't be the entire cause of course), Today that number has gone up to 1 in 50! This can not possibly be due to better diagnostics. So what IS causing the rise? When so many parents claim that they had perfectly normal babies until their MMR and the baby was obviously different after that, you have to put the shots as the leading suspect. Thermosil is the leading suspect because the symptoms of Autism so strongly resemble the symptoms of Mercury poisoning. Thermosil was never even hinted at being removed from the flu shot which is being pushed on pregnant women now, and independent analysis says there are still traces of it in the MMR (and no I don't have that link right now. It was an old story, like, a year and a half or something:-)). But there are so many other things in shots: formaldehyde, aluminum, aborted fetal cells, it could actually be a number of different things. Plus, as I said, there are other suspects out there, the shots are just the prime one.

    What we do know is SOMETHING is cause our children to have Autism. So if it isn't the shots, what is it?

    As to the rickets thing, this is the first time I have heard that myself and so it does need to be followed up. But we know for a fact that if mommy is lacking certain vitamins her baby will be lacking those vitamins at birth also. We also know that dark skin is slower to absorb enough sunshine to generate vitamin D and there was s serious problem at the turn of the century with the AA community having rickets because of tall buildings and pollution blocking the sun. This is why vit D was added to our milk. We also know that rickets is on the rise again (and has been for several years) because kids aren't going outside enough, are slathering on sunscreen when they do, and their parents have quit giving them milk because the are so afraid of the fat causing heart disease. So babies of darker skinned moms being born already at a disadvantage sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Not a bit surprising either. Depressing, yes. But surprising? nahh.

  3. By the way, there are other reasons to not vaccinate than the fear of Autism. This disease has not hit my immediate family, but I do have a cousin dealing with it in her grand-kids.

    For other reasons to avoid vaccines see


Thank you so much for commenting! I love to talk to my readers.

I do ask that there be no anonymous commenters, though. If I am brave enough to put my name on this blog, you should be too:-)

Please keep it civil. Remember we are all human and make mistakes, and that since we can't see each other's faces or hear each other's tone of voice, it is very hard to get the emotion in what we are saying each other. Use lots of emoticons! :-) And show grace and love to each other.